<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yonkly: Not a Twitter Killer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/19/yonkly-not-a-twitter-killer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/19/yonkly-not-a-twitter-killer/</link>
	<description>The World of Twitter and Microblogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:12:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: gofeedit</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/19/yonkly-not-a-twitter-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-7640</link>
		<dc:creator>gofeedit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 06:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/19/yonkly-not-a-twitter-killer/#comment-7640</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s a pretty innovative site actually.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#39;s a pretty innovative site actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Kelley</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/19/yonkly-not-a-twitter-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>William Kelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/19/yonkly-not-a-twitter-killer/#comment-254</guid>
		<description>No free version?! $10/month for basic?! $100/month for premium?! Are they on crack? How can you get any users without offering a free version. 
 
Incidentally, they changed the name of one of their features. They now have a &quot;Free Users&quot; row. So I can get 2000 &quot;Free&quot; users for only $40/month - what a deal! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No free version?! $10/month for basic?! $100/month for premium?! Are they on crack? How can you get any users without offering a free version. </p>
<p>Incidentally, they changed the name of one of their features. They now have a &quot;Free Users&quot; row. So I can get 2000 &quot;Free&quot; users for only $40/month &#8211; what a deal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/19/yonkly-not-a-twitter-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/19/yonkly-not-a-twitter-killer/#comment-250</guid>
		<description>Thanks for checking us out :-) 
 
Yonkly is actually free for the end users; however, like meetup, if you want to host a specific niche, or group, we put a price on it--mainly because we&#039;d rather have 1 microblog on tech with 100 users than the antithesis ;-) 
 
Will people be turned off because of this? Sure. However, we&#039;re sticking to our convictions that it&#039;s better for microblogging as a whole.  
 
Also, I think your wording of &quot;killing twitter&quot; misses the point completely. Furthermore, one must define the word kill.  
 
Does kill mean making more money than Twitter? If so, we&#039;ve already killed them. 
 
Does kill mean attracting a larger number of users? If so, Twitter is still alive and kickin&#039;! 
 
- Scott from Yonkly </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for checking us out <img src='http://www.twitterrati.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Yonkly is actually free for the end users; however, like meetup, if you want to host a specific niche, or group, we put a price on it&#8211;mainly because we&#039;d rather have 1 microblog on tech with 100 users than the antithesis <img src='http://www.twitterrati.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Will people be turned off because of this? Sure. However, we&#039;re sticking to our convictions that it&#039;s better for microblogging as a whole.  </p>
<p>Also, I think your wording of &quot;killing twitter&quot; misses the point completely. Furthermore, one must define the word kill.  </p>
<p>Does kill mean making more money than Twitter? If so, we&#039;ve already killed them. </p>
<p>Does kill mean attracting a larger number of users? If so, Twitter is still alive and kickin&#039;! </p>
<p>- Scott from Yonkly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emad Ibrahim</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/19/yonkly-not-a-twitter-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Emad Ibrahim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/19/yonkly-not-a-twitter-killer/#comment-249</guid>
		<description>I am glad you clarified that because we are NOT and do NOT want to be a twitter killer.  The same way Ning is not a facebook killer.   
 
This is a platform to enable people to create there own network private or public and have full control over it from having a custom domain, custom look, custom message size and prompt.  All that on top of the extra features that twitter does not have. 
 
We already have an amazing number of networks created from topics as varied as lawyers, sharepoint, photography, religion and some that are geo-centric e.g a bulgarian network, an egyptian network, a chinese network and so on. 
 
Also REMEMBER, Yonkly is FREE for users.  Only the network owner will pay. 
 
Some good examples are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.isweat.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.isweat.com&lt;/a&gt;with 2500+ members and photographersjournal.com which is only 2 days old and growing fast. 
 
Thanks for the review though and for taking a look at Yonkly. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad you clarified that because we are NOT and do NOT want to be a twitter killer.  The same way Ning is not a facebook killer.   </p>
<p>This is a platform to enable people to create there own network private or public and have full control over it from having a custom domain, custom look, custom message size and prompt.  All that on top of the extra features that twitter does not have. </p>
<p>We already have an amazing number of networks created from topics as varied as lawyers, sharepoint, photography, religion and some that are geo-centric e.g a bulgarian network, an egyptian network, a chinese network and so on. </p>
<p>Also REMEMBER, Yonkly is FREE for users.  Only the network owner will pay. </p>
<p>Some good examples are <a href="http://www.isweat.com" target="_blank">http://www.isweat.com</a>with 2500+ members and photographersjournal.com which is only 2 days old and growing fast. </p>
<p>Thanks for the review though and for taking a look at Yonkly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

