<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shrink Your Tweets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/30/shrink-your-tweets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/30/shrink-your-tweets/</link>
	<description>The World of Twitter and Microblogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:12:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajit D&#039;Sa</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/30/shrink-your-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajit D&#039;Sa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/30/shrink-your-tweets/#comment-501</guid>
		<description>Howard Yermish has it exactly right! Tweetshrink is not meant as a way of life or something that you should constantly do. It is just a useful helper there when you need it: &lt;a href=&quot;http://tweetshrink.com/about&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://tweetshrink.com/about&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard Yermish has it exactly right! Tweetshrink is not meant as a way of life or something that you should constantly do. It is just a useful helper there when you need it: <a href="http://tweetshrink.com/about" target="_blank">http://tweetshrink.com/about</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Yermish</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/30/shrink-your-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Yermish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 02:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/30/shrink-your-tweets/#comment-351</guid>
		<description>If you are using TweetDeck, TweetShrink is already built in for you. What is nice is that if you do have a post that is just a little bit too long, a quick click might just save you from pulling out words and losing the intended meaning. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are using TweetDeck, TweetShrink is already built in for you. What is nice is that if you do have a post that is just a little bit too long, a quick click might just save you from pulling out words and losing the intended meaning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joke My Twitt &#187; What&#8217;s Hot #3, Le Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/30/shrink-your-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Joke My Twitt &#187; What&#8217;s Hot #3, Le Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/30/shrink-your-tweets/#comment-341</guid>
		<description>[...] Shrink your Tweets (EN) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shrink your Tweets (EN) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moody834</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/30/shrink-your-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Moody834</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 19:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/30/shrink-your-tweets/#comment-328</guid>
		<description>Thing I thought right away was: Don&#039;t people know how to do this on their own already? I mean, it&#039;s adding a time-consuming step to accomplish something I already know how to do. And surely, you can&#039;t have too much more to say in a tweet than the 140 char. w/ abbr. allows for, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thing I thought right away was: Don&#8217;t people know how to do this on their own already? I mean, it&#8217;s adding a time-consuming step to accomplish something I already know how to do. And surely, you can&#8217;t have too much more to say in a tweet than the 140 char. w/ abbr. allows for, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinah</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/30/shrink-your-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 11:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/30/shrink-your-tweets/#comment-331</guid>
		<description>&quot;Shrink Your Tweets&quot; actually brought to mind a service that would psychoanalyze your tweets. Does such a thing exist yet? Could be fun. As for squeezing more into twitter -- defeats the purpose. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Shrink Your Tweets&quot; actually brought to mind a service that would psychoanalyze your tweets. Does such a thing exist yet? Could be fun. As for squeezing more into twitter &#8212; defeats the purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicki</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/30/shrink-your-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 07:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/30/shrink-your-tweets/#comment-329</guid>
		<description>Yuck. As chris24 says &quot;and mangled, at that&quot;.  One of the points in my Twitter &quot;follow policy:  &quot;If u r cnstntly abbrvtng I wont folow u.&quot;  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yuck. As chris24 says &quot;and mangled, at that&quot;.  One of the points in my Twitter &quot;follow policy:  &quot;If u r cnstntly abbrvtng I wont folow u.&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris24</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/30/shrink-your-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>chris24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/2008/12/30/shrink-your-tweets/#comment-312</guid>
		<description>Interesting service. Tantek (&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/t&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;@t&lt;/a&gt;) has &lt;a href=&quot;http://tantek.pbwiki.com/TxtShorthands&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;some notes on his personal wiki&lt;/a&gt; for other suggested &#039;txt shorthands&#039;, which could also apply to tweets.  
 
Although, I do feel the same way as you: why would anyone want to put more into a tweet? Being able to fit more into a tweet would encourage more words to be put into a tweet (and mangled, at that), which would take a little bit longer to comprehend, making Twitter less of a on-the-side/always-there social network, and more of an independent social network (like Facebook, where you can&#039;t multi-task as easily). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting service. Tantek (<a href="http://twitter.com/t" target="_blank">@t</a>) has <a href="http://tantek.pbwiki.com/TxtShorthands" target="_blank">some notes on his personal wiki</a> for other suggested &#039;txt shorthands&#039;, which could also apply to tweets.  </p>
<p>Although, I do feel the same way as you: why would anyone want to put more into a tweet? Being able to fit more into a tweet would encourage more words to be put into a tweet (and mangled, at that), which would take a little bit longer to comprehend, making Twitter less of a on-the-side/always-there social network, and more of an independent social network (like Facebook, where you can&#039;t multi-task as easily).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

