<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tweetvisor: Good but Splitweet&#8217;s Better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/01/10/tweetvisor-good-but-splitweets-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/01/10/tweetvisor-good-but-splitweets-better/</link>
	<description>The World of Twitter and Microblogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:12:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: AGORACOM - George</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/01/10/tweetvisor-good-but-splitweets-better/comment-page-1/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>AGORACOM - George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/01/10/tweetvisor-good-but-splitweets-better/#comment-487</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s odd.  I posted a comment here using my Blackberry the other day (it was the first comment) and it&#039;s not here.  Technical fail? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s odd.  I posted a comment here using my Blackberry the other day (it was the first comment) and it&#039;s not here.  Technical fail?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markevans</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/01/10/tweetvisor-good-but-splitweets-better/comment-page-1/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>markevans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/01/10/tweetvisor-good-but-splitweets-better/#comment-477</guid>
		<description>Albert, 
 
Hey, thanks for leaving a comment. I&#039;m clearly a big fan of Splitweet so looking forward to new features!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Albert, </p>
<p>Hey, thanks for leaving a comment. I&#039;m clearly a big fan of Splitweet so looking forward to new features!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Lombarte</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/01/10/tweetvisor-good-but-splitweets-better/comment-page-1/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Lombarte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/01/10/tweetvisor-good-but-splitweets-better/#comment-476</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark, nice article :) 
 
We are currently working on the filtering feature, so you will be able to isolate 1,2,3 or N accounts and see only the content for your selected accounts. We know it&#039;s hard to track some accounts plenty of &quot;followings&quot; but in short you will be able to focus on what you want :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark, nice article <img src='http://www.twitterrati.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>We are currently working on the filtering feature, so you will be able to isolate 1,2,3 or N accounts and see only the content for your selected accounts. We know it&#039;s hard to track some accounts plenty of &quot;followings&quot; but in short you will be able to focus on what you want <img src='http://www.twitterrati.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweetdeck rules &#8212; that is all</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/01/10/tweetvisor-good-but-splitweets-better/comment-page-1/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweetdeck rules &#8212; that is all</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/01/10/tweetvisor-good-but-splitweets-better/#comment-456</guid>
		<description>[...] to the Web interface, presumably). I had a look, but like my friend Mark Evans &#8212; who wrote a post on his Twitterrati blog &#8212; I was underwhelmed by Tweetvisor&#8217;s interface. It might be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the Web interface, presumably). I had a look, but like my friend Mark Evans &#8212; who wrote a post on his Twitterrati blog &#8212; I was underwhelmed by Tweetvisor&#8217;s interface. It might be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AGORACOM - George</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/01/10/tweetvisor-good-but-splitweets-better/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>AGORACOM - George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/01/10/tweetvisor-good-but-splitweets-better/#comment-455</guid>
		<description>Mark, thanks for the great review.  Interesting to see your divergence with Techcrunch.

I&#039;d like to start using one of these services but I get the feeling another/better solution will come out soon.

Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, thanks for the great review.  Interesting to see your divergence with Techcrunch.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to start using one of these services but I get the feeling another/better solution will come out soon.</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

