<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Twitter Shooting Itself in the Foot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/01/22/is-twitter-shooting-itself-in-the-foot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/01/22/is-twitter-shooting-itself-in-the-foot/</link>
	<description>The World of Twitter and Microblogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:12:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: The Burnman</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/01/22/is-twitter-shooting-itself-in-the-foot/comment-page-1/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>The Burnman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=400#comment-519</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree.  Twitter is currently has no revenue generation model in place, so placing a restriction on the number of API calls is more than reasonable.  In fact, allowing services to fire off 20,000 API calls per hour seems a fair bit more than reasonable in my book.  Personally, I don&#039;t see why any &quot;able-minded entrepreneur&quot; would want to build an application around Twitter which would need to hit the API more than 20,000 times per hour.  If one truly needs that level (or higher) of access to the API, perhaps it is time to look into developing a whole platform around the application, rather than hijacking someone else&#039;s bandwidth and delivery system. 
 
Until Twitter is charging for access to either the service or the API, I don&#039;t see how we can reasonably set expectations for an advertising-free service we get to use at no cost whatsoever. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree.  Twitter is currently has no revenue generation model in place, so placing a restriction on the number of API calls is more than reasonable.  In fact, allowing services to fire off 20,000 API calls per hour seems a fair bit more than reasonable in my book.  Personally, I don&#039;t see why any &quot;able-minded entrepreneur&quot; would want to build an application around Twitter which would need to hit the API more than 20,000 times per hour.  If one truly needs that level (or higher) of access to the API, perhaps it is time to look into developing a whole platform around the application, rather than hijacking someone else&#039;s bandwidth and delivery system. </p>
<p>Until Twitter is charging for access to either the service or the API, I don&#039;t see how we can reasonably set expectations for an advertising-free service we get to use at no cost whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 140Char &#187; What&#8217;s happening with applications on Twitter?</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/01/22/is-twitter-shooting-itself-in-the-foot/comment-page-1/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>140Char &#187; What&#8217;s happening with applications on Twitter?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=400#comment-516</guid>
		<description>[...] of how many calls are average, so take a look at Jesse Stay&#8217;s thoughts on the SocialToo blog, Mark Evans at Twitterati, or SocialToo advisor Louis Gray (Who very kindly recommended and linked to 140char [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of how many calls are average, so take a look at Jesse Stay&#8217;s thoughts on the SocialToo blog, Mark Evans at Twitterati, or SocialToo advisor Louis Gray (Who very kindly recommended and linked to 140char [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Posts about Entrepreneurs as of January 22, 2009 &#124; The Lessnau Lounge</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/01/22/is-twitter-shooting-itself-in-the-foot/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Posts about Entrepreneurs as of January 22, 2009 &#124; The Lessnau Lounge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=400#comment-514</guid>
		<description>[...] part of the historic inauguration of our 44th President Barack Obama. President Obama has already   Is Twitter Shooting Itself in the Foot - twitterrati.com 01/22/2009 One of the biggest reasons why Twitter has gained some much momentum [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] part of the historic inauguration of our 44th President Barack Obama. President Obama has already   Is Twitter Shooting Itself in the Foot &#8211; twitterrati.com 01/22/2009 One of the biggest reasons why Twitter has gained some much momentum [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

