<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Doubts About Twitter the Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/03/19/doubts-about-twitter-the-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/03/19/doubts-about-twitter-the-business/</link>
	<description>The World of Twitter and Microblogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:06:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John McTigue</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/03/19/doubts-about-twitter-the-business/comment-page-1/#comment-1144</link>
		<dc:creator>John McTigue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=647#comment-1144</guid>
		<description>I think the text-based approach will probably work, after all a large proportion of tweets are already ads - tweeters promoting their blogs, bootcamps, etc. We&#039;re already used to that and accept it as part of the deal. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the text-based approach will probably work, after all a large proportion of tweets are already ads &#8211; tweeters promoting their blogs, bootcamps, etc. We&#039;re already used to that and accept it as part of the deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doubts About Twitter the Business &#124; Twitterrati &#124; Money Blog : 10 Dollars : Money Articles.</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/03/19/doubts-about-twitter-the-business/comment-page-1/#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>Doubts About Twitter the Business &#124; Twitterrati &#124; Money Blog : 10 Dollars : Money Articles.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=647#comment-1139</guid>
		<description>[...] Here is the original: Doubts About Twitter the Business &#124; Twitterrati [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here is the original: Doubts About Twitter the Business | Twitterrati [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/03/19/doubts-about-twitter-the-business/comment-page-1/#comment-1134</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=647#comment-1134</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s interesting that everybody besides Twitter is trying to find ways to monetize Twitter. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#039;s interesting that everybody besides Twitter is trying to find ways to monetize Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tenner</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/03/19/doubts-about-twitter-the-business/comment-page-1/#comment-1130</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tenner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=647#comment-1130</guid>
		<description>Funnily, I&#039;ve clicked on those ads already. And since they were interesting things, I&#039;m likely to keep an eye on that area for the foreseeable future, to see if anything else neat crops up. 
 
Seems like a masterful roll-out of ads... first, make the users look at the area where you&#039;ll place the ads, and then put paid ads there. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funnily, I&#039;ve clicked on those ads already. And since they were interesting things, I&#039;m likely to keep an eye on that area for the foreseeable future, to see if anything else neat crops up. </p>
<p>Seems like a masterful roll-out of ads&#8230; first, make the users look at the area where you&#039;ll place the ads, and then put paid ads there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gillian Brouse</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/03/19/doubts-about-twitter-the-business/comment-page-1/#comment-1129</link>
		<dc:creator>Gillian Brouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=647#comment-1129</guid>
		<description>Yes... I&#039;ve worked with a  number of companies that turned down money that was not quite good enough (too much dilution, usually) and lived (just) long enough to regret that decision.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes&#8230; I&#039;ve worked with a  number of companies that turned down money that was not quite good enough (too much dilution, usually) and lived (just) long enough to regret that decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/03/19/doubts-about-twitter-the-business/comment-page-1/#comment-1128</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=647#comment-1128</guid>
		<description>Good points. There were many companies during the first dot-com boom that turned down cash thinking the good times were going to last. Only later did they realize that you taking it when it&#039;s offered. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points. There were many companies during the first dot-com boom that turned down cash thinking the good times were going to last. Only later did they realize that you taking it when it&#039;s offered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gillian Brouse</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/03/19/doubts-about-twitter-the-business/comment-page-1/#comment-1127</link>
		<dc:creator>Gillian Brouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=647#comment-1127</guid>
		<description>Twitter followed the number one rule for companies, especially tech companies in fast-changing technical and competitive landscapes.  
 
Don&#039;t raise money when you need it; raise it when you can.  Can&#039;t fault them for that. 
 
I still think they stand a good chance of inventing a business model that will work. I remember when no one thought Google would invent a business model that would work. And then questioned that business model (text link ads) when it was rolled out.  
 
Twitter&#039;s funding gives them a bit more runway and a few more options about how they proceed. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter followed the number one rule for companies, especially tech companies in fast-changing technical and competitive landscapes.  </p>
<p>Don&#039;t raise money when you need it; raise it when you can.  Can&#039;t fault them for that. </p>
<p>I still think they stand a good chance of inventing a business model that will work. I remember when no one thought Google would invent a business model that would work. And then questioned that business model (text link ads) when it was rolled out.  </p>
<p>Twitter&#039;s funding gives them a bit more runway and a few more options about how they proceed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Samuel</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/03/19/doubts-about-twitter-the-business/comment-page-1/#comment-1126</link>
		<dc:creator>John Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=647#comment-1126</guid>
		<description>There are a lot of discussions about the business model of Twitter. As Chris says, the text based ads won&#039;t be a successful idea. Though statistics show that nearly 50% use Twitter from the web, but with new desktop clients and mobile applications coming up every day, text based ads will not be a huge success. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of discussions about the business model of Twitter. As Chris says, the text based ads won&#039;t be a successful idea. Though statistics show that nearly 50% use Twitter from the web, but with new desktop clients and mobile applications coming up every day, text based ads will not be a huge success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Charabaruk</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/03/19/doubts-about-twitter-the-business/comment-page-1/#comment-1125</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Charabaruk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=647#comment-1125</guid>
		<description>They are already running ads, but they are quite discrete, text-based ads which don&#039;t get in the way of any tweet streams. And they&#039;ve been doing so all week. 
 
Given that they&#039;re practically invisible, however, it&#039;s likely that they will eventually either become more intrusive, or be removed in favour of other monetization schemes. Such as selling positions in the recommended users page. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are already running ads, but they are quite discrete, text-based ads which don&#039;t get in the way of any tweet streams. And they&#039;ve been doing so all week. </p>
<p>Given that they&#039;re practically invisible, however, it&#039;s likely that they will eventually either become more intrusive, or be removed in favour of other monetization schemes. Such as selling positions in the recommended users page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debt-free Scholar</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/03/19/doubts-about-twitter-the-business/comment-page-1/#comment-1124</link>
		<dc:creator>Debt-free Scholar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=647#comment-1124</guid>
		<description>I hope that they do not run ads.  However, if that is necessary then I do not mind...much. 
 
Thanks, 
Nate </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that they do not run ads.  However, if that is necessary then I do not mind&#8230;much. </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Nate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
