<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Still Uses Twitter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/04/25/who-still-uses-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/04/25/who-still-uses-twitter/</link>
	<description>The World of Twitter and Microblogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:12:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-04-26 &#171; Sarah Hartley</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/04/25/who-still-uses-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2305</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-04-26 &#171; Sarah Hartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=769#comment-2305</guid>
		<description>[...] Who Still Uses Twitter? Given these two realities, how can Twitter leverage the fast-growing Twitter ecosystem so it can start generating enough revenue to justify the venture capital it has raised? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Who Still Uses Twitter? Given these two realities, how can Twitter leverage the fast-growing Twitter ecosystem so it can start generating enough revenue to justify the venture capital it has raised? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reilly</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/04/25/who-still-uses-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2294</link>
		<dc:creator>Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=769#comment-2294</guid>
		<description>i would be interested to see a subscriptioi would be interested to see a subscription that increases API refreshes where a free account would get a small amount of refreshes per hour (eg 30) and then tier subscription payments for moren  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would be interested to see a subscriptioi would be interested to see a subscription that increases API refreshes where a free account would get a small amount of refreshes per hour (eg 30) and then tier subscription payments for moren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Still Uses Twitter? &#124; Twitterrati &#124; Twitter Kid</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/04/25/who-still-uses-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2258</link>
		<dc:creator>Who Still Uses Twitter? &#124; Twitterrati &#124; Twitter Kid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=769#comment-2258</guid>
		<description>[...] here: Who Still Uses Twitter? &#124; Twitterrati No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here: Who Still Uses Twitter? | Twitterrati No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/04/25/who-still-uses-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2254</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=769#comment-2254</guid>
		<description>Same here. I don&#039;t know why, but for me it&#039;s easier using twitter.com, I&#039;ll have it open in the background when I&#039;m browsing, and only use it occasionally. If I used a client, I&#039;d have to load it up and wait for it to get going, before typing a sentence and shutting it down. Just seems a little bit pointless to me... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same here. I don&#039;t know why, but for me it&#039;s easier using twitter.com, I&#039;ll have it open in the background when I&#039;m browsing, and only use it occasionally. If I used a client, I&#039;d have to load it up and wait for it to get going, before typing a sentence and shutting it down. Just seems a little bit pointless to me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dozykraut</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/04/25/who-still-uses-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2252</link>
		<dc:creator>dozykraut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=769#comment-2252</guid>
		<description>You write &#039;it seems like a no-brainer&#039; EXACTLY! It&#039;s an idea from a person without a brain. Twitter&#039;s ecosystem would be dead within no time if they charged third-party developers for access to the API.

Even Microsoft wouldn&#039;t be so daft as to charge for access to their API. Quickest way to alienate your developer community and kill yourself in the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You write &#8216;it seems like a no-brainer&#8217; EXACTLY! It&#8217;s an idea from a person without a brain. Twitter&#8217;s ecosystem would be dead within no time if they charged third-party developers for access to the API.</p>
<p>Even Microsoft wouldn&#8217;t be so daft as to charge for access to their API. Quickest way to alienate your developer community and kill yourself in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZuDfunck</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/04/25/who-still-uses-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2249</link>
		<dc:creator>ZuDfunck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=769#comment-2249</guid>
		<description>I guess I am in the minority 
I use Twitter.com as opposed to a client 
And love it! 
I can&#039;t be the only one 
As far as Why I don&#039;t use a client? 
For me it&#039;s like looking at though a Porthole 
I feel more in touch using a Web interface 
I know, just a dumb Hippie 
But that&#039;s how I roll! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I am in the minority<br />
I use Twitter.com as opposed to a client<br />
And love it!<br />
I can&#039;t be the only one<br />
As far as Why I don&#039;t use a client?<br />
For me it&#039;s like looking at though a Porthole<br />
I feel more in touch using a Web interface<br />
I know, just a dumb Hippie<br />
But that&#039;s how I roll!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

