<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple on the Prowl for Twitter??</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/05/05/apple-on-the-prowl-for-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/05/05/apple-on-the-prowl-for-twitter/</link>
	<description>The World of Twitter and Microblogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:31:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PenguinPcHelper</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/05/05/apple-on-the-prowl-for-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2688</link>
		<dc:creator>PenguinPcHelper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 13:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/05/05/apple-on-the-prowl-for-twitter/#comment-2688</guid>
		<description>agreed  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/05/05/apple-on-the-prowl-for-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2651</link>
		<dc:creator>gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/05/05/apple-on-the-prowl-for-twitter/#comment-2651</guid>
		<description>I agree with Karim. Everything I&#039;ve heard says Biz and Ev have no urgency to sell for anything less than a billion. There&#039;s a potential that literally everyone could have a Twitter account, in the same way they have email accounts. If it&#039;s integral to a users web experience, than selling it would be crazy.  
 
PS - it seems like TechCrunch has almost no credibility these days. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Karim. Everything I&#039;ve heard says Biz and Ev have no urgency to sell for anything less than a billion. There&#039;s a potential that literally everyone could have a Twitter account, in the same way they have email accounts. If it&#039;s integral to a users web experience, than selling it would be crazy.  </p>
<p>PS &#8211; it seems like TechCrunch has almost no credibility these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karim</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/05/05/apple-on-the-prowl-for-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2648</link>
		<dc:creator>Karim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 12:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/05/05/apple-on-the-prowl-for-twitter/#comment-2648</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not inevitable that Twitter will be purchased wholesale. If the current owners can figure out a way to make money off of it they could take it to IPO themselves (a la google).  
 
In terms of making money from Twitter, I don&#039;t think this is such a cryptic conundrum, they&#039;re already experimenting with &#039;ads&#039; on user profiles and it wouldn&#039;t take a genius to figure out running contextual ads against search terms could be profitable too.  
 
To my mind the key issues Twitter has to sort out are spam and platform stability.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s not inevitable that Twitter will be purchased wholesale. If the current owners can figure out a way to make money off of it they could take it to IPO themselves (a la google).  </p>
<p>In terms of making money from Twitter, I don&#039;t think this is such a cryptic conundrum, they&#039;re already experimenting with &#039;ads&#039; on user profiles and it wouldn&#039;t take a genius to figure out running contextual ads against search terms could be profitable too.  </p>
<p>To my mind the key issues Twitter has to sort out are spam and platform stability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
