<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Assetize Aims to Monetize Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/09/25/assetize-aims-to-monetize-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/09/25/assetize-aims-to-monetize-twitter/</link>
	<description>The World of Twitter and Microblogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:12:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: The Assetize Blog &#187; DemoCamp Presentation and Coverage</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/09/25/assetize-aims-to-monetize-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-6755</link>
		<dc:creator>The Assetize Blog &#187; DemoCamp Presentation and Coverage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=1406#comment-6755</guid>
		<description>[...] (9/25): Mark Evans and Twitterrati also wrote about us, which you can read here. His coverage has been very helpful in getting the word out – the post has been retweeted [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (9/25): Mark Evans and Twitterrati also wrote about us, which you can read here. His coverage has been very helpful in getting the word out – the post has been retweeted [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Assetize Blog &#187; DemoCamp Presentation and Coverage</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/09/25/assetize-aims-to-monetize-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-6754</link>
		<dc:creator>The Assetize Blog &#187; DemoCamp Presentation and Coverage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=1406#comment-6754</guid>
		<description>[...] (9/25): Mark Evans and Twitterrati also wrote about us, which you can read here. His coverage has been very helpful in getting the word out &#8211; the post has been retweeted [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (9/25): Mark Evans and Twitterrati also wrote about us, which you can read here. His coverage has been very helpful in getting the word out &#8211; the post has been retweeted [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Assetize Blog &#187; DemoCamp Presentation and Coverage</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/09/25/assetize-aims-to-monetize-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-6448</link>
		<dc:creator>The Assetize Blog &#187; DemoCamp Presentation and Coverage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=1406#comment-6448</guid>
		<description>[...] (9/25): Mark Evans and Twitterrati also wrote about us, which you can read here. His coverage has been very helpful in getting the word out &#8211; the post has been retweeted [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (9/25): Mark Evans and Twitterrati also wrote about us, which you can read here. His coverage has been very helpful in getting the word out &#8211; the post has been retweeted [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Dodd</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/09/25/assetize-aims-to-monetize-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-6381</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Dodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=1406#comment-6381</guid>
		<description>I tend to agree with Burnman.  What surprises me is that the Social Media industry continuously claims that advertsing doesn&#039;t work.  Yet, we keep trying to monetize ourselves through advertising system like Assetize and the venture community keeps biting.  Where&#039;s the disconnect?   
 
I personally think Twitter was smart not heading down the advertising path and try to find something better / different that will truly give it a unique value proposition.  We already know it is a unique service, so there is a way.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to agree with Burnman.  What surprises me is that the Social Media industry continuously claims that advertsing doesn&#039;t work.  Yet, we keep trying to monetize ourselves through advertising system like Assetize and the venture community keeps biting.  Where&#039;s the disconnect?   </p>
<p>I personally think Twitter was smart not heading down the advertising path and try to find something better / different that will truly give it a unique value proposition.  We already know it is a unique service, so there is a way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burnman</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/09/25/assetize-aims-to-monetize-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-6328</link>
		<dc:creator>Burnman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=1406#comment-6328</guid>
		<description>There is nothing &quot;interesting&quot; about the platform, it is simply another spam injection system which hijacks another service&#039;s (Twitter) bandwidth in violation of Twitter&#039;s Terms of Service: 
 
&quot;Some of the factors that we take into account when determining what conduct is considered to be spamming are: 
- If you post duplicate content over multiple accounts or multiple duplicate updates on one account&quot; 
From: help.twitter.com/forums/26257/entries/18311 
 
I do not know ANYONE who welcomes spam in their Twitter timeline.  While I could live with advertisements if they come from Twitter to support the service, 3rd party spammers such as Magpie, TwittAd, and now Assetize only serve to devalue the platform and the users who unfortunately utilize them. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing &quot;interesting&quot; about the platform, it is simply another spam injection system which hijacks another service&#039;s (Twitter) bandwidth in violation of Twitter&#039;s Terms of Service: </p>
<p>&quot;Some of the factors that we take into account when determining what conduct is considered to be spamming are:<br />
- If you post duplicate content over multiple accounts or multiple duplicate updates on one account&quot;<br />
From: help.twitter.com/forums/26257/entries/18311 </p>
<p>I do not know ANYONE who welcomes spam in their Twitter timeline.  While I could live with advertisements if they come from Twitter to support the service, 3rd party spammers such as Magpie, TwittAd, and now Assetize only serve to devalue the platform and the users who unfortunately utilize them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

