<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Emergence of Twitvertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/11/22/the-emergence-of-twitvertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/11/22/the-emergence-of-twitvertising/</link>
	<description>The World of Twitter and Microblogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:06:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marko Saric</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/11/22/the-emergence-of-twitvertising/comment-page-1/#comment-7548</link>
		<dc:creator>Marko Saric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterrati.com/?p=1550#comment-7548</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read that article earlier, I never noticed paid tweets until now but will keep an eye from now on. I even just signed up for that service to test it out... but I do not think these numbers will keep going as I simply do not see that much value in paying so much for someone to tweet your message. We all know how easily tweets get forgotten... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve read that article earlier, I never noticed paid tweets until now but will keep an eye from now on. I even just signed up for that service to test it out&#8230; but I do not think these numbers will keep going as I simply do not see that much value in paying so much for someone to tweet your message. We all know how easily tweets get forgotten&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
